scottish wrote:That's certainly a possibility I wondered about in the initial post. But it would take the tally past 3,800 to 3,802. Given that I've no re-checked three times and HibeeJibee coming to the same total it's beginning to look like Accies are in error somewhere along the line. AFAIK there aren't any Accies historians who frequent this site so I'll send this link to the SFL and see what they think.
scottish wrote:Thanks. I've done just that. I also emailed David Thomson at the SFL. I've removed the email address you posted as they tend to get harvested by spambots.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 3 guests